Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137483›Full record

ReviewSage open pediatrics

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Triage in Pediatric Emergency Departments: Accuracy, Bias, and Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Narrative Review.

Eslam Abady, Mandy Elewa, Habiba Abdelhameed Elrefaey, Kevin Thomas Mathew, Panos Tamvakologos, Kayleigh Kuhn, Mohammed Alsabri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sage open pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eslam AbadyTanta University, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2087-3297
Mandy ElewaIstanbul University, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9750-4413
Habiba Abdelhameed ElrefaeyTanta University, Egypt.
Kevin Thomas MathewDavid Tvildiani Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8278-6994
Panos TamvakologosSt George's University, West Indies, Grenada.
Kayleigh KuhnThe Brooklyn Hospital Center, NY, USA.
Mohammed AlsabriSt Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7278-2289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AI-driven triage presents a transformative opportunity to address persistent challenges in pediatric emergency care, from overcrowding and waiting times to human error and outcome disparities. This narrative review demonstrates that AI systems can achieve high accuracy in predicting critical outcomes, with pooled AUROCs of 0.87 for hospital admission, 0.93 for ICU admission, and 0.93 for mortality, significantly outperforming traditional triage scales, while observational studies report associations with improved efficiency, reduced triage errors, and enhanced resource allocation. However, publication bias favoring positive results affects the available evidence, and studies reporting no benefit or performance degradation exist. The promise of AI is tempered by significant challenges: performance varies across pediatric subgroups, the risks of perpetuating and amplifying bias remain inadequately addressed, and workflow integration and medico-legal liability require careful navigation. AI augments clinical judgment, guided by robust governance frameworks, fairness auditing, and human oversight for more equitable emergency care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiasclinical decision supporthealth equityimplementation sciencemachine learningnarrative reviewnatural language processingpediatric emergency medicinetriage

Identifiers

PMID42137483
PMCPMC13168721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.