Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137460›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2026

Comparing the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors with and without microwave ablation in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world clinical practice: A retrospective cohort study.

Chun Wei, Sizhong Chen, Li Ding, Ting Zhou, Fan Huang, Yong Wang, Ou Jiang, Yu Liu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06581497 (Comparing the Efficacy of ICIs With and Without MWA in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real-World Clinical Practice), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06581497 completednot on this map

Comparing the Efficacy of ICIs With and Without MWA in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real-World Clinical Practice

TypeobservationalSponsorThe First People's Hospital of NeijiangRan2022 to 2026Enrolled52ConditionsHCC, Therapy Adverse EffectArmsICIs, ICIs+MWA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chun WeiDepartment of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, Sichuan 641000, P.R. China.
Sizhong ChenDepartment of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, Sichuan 641000, P.R. China.
Li DingDepartment of Oncology, Dechang County People's Hospital, Xichang, Sichuan 615500, P.R. China.
Ting ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Dechang County People's Hospital, Xichang, Sichuan 615500, P.R. China.
Fan HuangDepartment of Oncology, Chuantou Xichang Hospital, Xichang, Sichuan 615500, P.R. China.
Yong WangDepartment of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, Sichuan 641000, P.R. China.
Ou JiangDepartment of Oncology, First People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, Sichuan 641000, P.R. China.
Yu LiuDepartment of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, Sichuan 641000, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Microwave ablation (MWA), a form of thermal ablation, may elicit systemic immune responses and could potentially augment the clinical activity of ICIs, particularly in advanced disease. The present study retrospectively assessed 52 eligible patients with limited progression or oligometastatic disease treated between January 2022 and January 2024 with either ICIs alone or ICIs plus MWA. A total of 21 patients received the combination regimen (predominantly programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors), and 31 received ICI monotherapy. The recorded baseline characteristics did not suggest notable between-group imbalances; however, key tumor burden descriptors were incompletely captured, and residual confounding cannot be excluded. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 9.7 and 51.6% with ICIs alone, respectively, vs. 28.6 and 81.0% with ICIs plus MWA. The DCR was higher in the combination group (P=0.031), whereas the between-group difference in ORR was not statistically significant (P=0.133) compared with the monotherapy group. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.0 months with monotherapy and 16.8 months with combination therapy (log-rank P=0.008). In the multivariable Cox analysis, the combination therapy was associated with improved OS (adjusted HR=0.176; 95% CI, 0.048-0.642; Wald P=0.008); however, given the small sample size and limited number of OS events, this adjusted HR may be imprecise and sensitive to model specification and should be interpreted as exploratory. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 vs. 9.0 months (log-rank P<0.001), consistent with the multivariable model (adjusted HR=0.270; 95% CI, 0.122-0.595; Wald P=0.001). There was not a clear unexpected safety pattern observed, but safety comparisons were descriptive only and underpowered. In the present retrospective cohort of selected patients with advanced HCC and limited progression/oligometastatic disease, ICIs plus MWA was associated with longer PFS and OS compared with ICIs alone. The interpretation is limited by the small sample size, potential residual confounding and model instability. The direction of benefit was consistent across Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses, although the adjusted OS effect estimate may be imprecise. The present study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 03 September 2024 (trial no. NCT06581497).

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinomaimmune checkpoint inhibitorsmicrowave ablation

Identifiers

PMID42137460
PMCPMC13168844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.