ArticleEnvironmental health insights2026
Involving Children Under 5 years in a Hand Hygiene Intervention Study at Preschools in South Africa.
Article in Environmental health insights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Involving children in research may include opportunities for their participation in assisting in the development of appropriate data collection tools, providing ideas for interventions and even collecting data themselves. Using a reflexive approach to research by not having preconceived ideas, and recognising that children's participation can play an important role in improving the quality of the research. This paper aims to show how applying reflexivity and noting children's actions during research improved the ethical and methodological quality of a study, providing a roadmap for future researchers to follow. Methodology: An action-based approach, using the actions and reactions of the study participants, was applied during a hand hygiene intervention conducted at preschools in South Africa (N = 17). Data was collected from 19 caregivers, 191 parents and 160 children aged 4 to 5 years using various data collection tools. During the pilot and main study, the researcher made use of field notes to apply a measure of reflexivity and adaptability during the data collection and intervention stages. Results: Ethical considerations and methods were improved through the actions of the child participants. Children reacted with discomfort and trepidation to the swabbing of hands and use of unfamiliar research assistants to collect data, resulting in a change in the data collection methods. Actions of children during the observation phase resulted in additional data being collected to determine any significance between activities and HH moments. Handwashing was changed to include physical hand movement guidance, as 18.5% of children were unable to complete handwashing steps without assistance. Conclusion: Researchers should apply reflexivity and adaptability when involving children, ethically prioritising children's needs and interpreting children's voices, with the child's best interest and comfort being paramount. Research protocols should be continuously adapted and revised based on participants' reactions during the study to improve the quality of research processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.