ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2026
Early and Mid-term Effects of Ankle and Hindfoot Arthrodesis on Quality of Life.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Open vs Arthroscopic Tibiotalar Arthrodesis: A Comparative Cohort Study from an Asian Tertiary Center.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hindfoot fusion is commonly performed to relieve pain in patients with end-stage ankle and hindfoot arthritis. However, its impact on specific aspects of health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and the trajectory of improvement is not well established. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of hindfoot fusion on HrQoL at both short- and mid-term follow-up. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on a prospective database of patients who underwent hindfoot fusion for severe pain, including ankle, subtalar, and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodeses. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores for HrQoL: Physical Functioning (SFPF), Role Physical (SFRP), Bodily Pain (SFBP), General Health (SFGH), Vitality (SFVI), Social Functioning (SFSF), Role Emotional (SFRE), and Mental Health (SFMH). Patient satisfaction was assessed using a Likert scale. Scores were recorded preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively. Although optimal deformity correction was desired, alleviation of pain was the main goal and deformity angles were not analysed in this study. Results: At 6 months, ankle fusion patients reported significant improvements in SFPF (+21.00, Conclusion: Hindfoot fusion was associated with significant gains in functional and pain-specific patient-reported outcomes. Improvements were mainly observed within the first 6 months for ankle and tibiotalocalcaneal fusion, with subtalar fusion demonstrating a slower but comparable trajectory of recovery. High patient satisfaction was reported across all groups at 2 years. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.