Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137427›Full record

ArticlePlastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.)2026

Alignment of Learning Objectives in Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Programs.

Cameron J Leong, Stephanie Cooper, Rebecca Courtemanche, David Tang, Terence Kwan-Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cameron J LeongFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Stephanie CooperDivision of Plastic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Rebecca CourtemancheDivision of Plastic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8805-3670
David TangFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Terence Kwan-WongDivision of Plastic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8393-484X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Competence by Design (CBD) is a model of medical education developed by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. CBD emphasizes an outcomes-based approach to residency training, replacing traditional models of time-based training. CBD focuses on the achievement of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), which are key tasks of a discipline. Misalignment of educational priorities between teachers and learners can negatively impact learning and quality of care. This study aims to compare the learning priorities of plastic surgery residents and attendings, as well as explore perceptions of CBD. Methods: An online survey was administered to plastic surgery residents and attendings identified via the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons mailing list. Participants ranked milestones by learning priority using a 5-point Likert scale. Participants were also asked their opinions on CBD, and responses were analyzed thematically. Results: A total of 76 participants (25 residents and 51 attendings) responded to the survey (15% response rate). Residents ranked gathering a relevant clinical history as less important than attendings (odds ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.98, Conclusions: Overall, this exploratory study showed good concordance between resident and attending plastic surgeon prioritization of EPA milestones. Perceived benefits and limitations of CBD in plastic surgery are similar to those reported in other specialties. Many attendings have knowledge gaps in the implementation of EPA evaluations.

Indexed as

competence by designcompetency-based medical educationEntrustable Professional Activitiesmedical educationplastic surgeryresidency

Identifiers

PMID42137427
PMCPMC13167915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.