ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Understanding social gym intimidation and anxiety using the power-threat-meaning framework.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While many gymgoers do not experience psychological barriers to gym use, some feel anxious and intimidated there in the presence of other users. Qualitative research has suggested gyms can be places of unequal power leading to threats to one's adequacy of self, and privilege certain users based on demographics, masculinity, size, fitness, performance, competence, etc. Social comparison and trait social anxiety have been suggested as contributing to gym anxiety. However, a theoretical approach is needed to provide a coherent explanation of gym anxiety which can inform interventions; there is no current theory in use in the research literature. I argue that gym anxiety is not the same as social physique anxiety (a limited concern about physique evaluation) nor social anxiety (often conceptualized as a mental health "disorder" rather than a response to the norm-laden setting of the gym). I propose that the most suitable theoretical framework to explain gym anxiety is Johnstone and Boyle's Power-Threat-Meaning Framework (PTMF), designed to explain psychological problems or distress. Gym anxiety or intimidation does not represent a disorder or pathology but an understandable response among some users to the power differentials of the gym environment. The PTMF explains how the negative operation of social power, in combination with societal and personal meaning-making, can lead to a perception of subtle threats to one's psychological needs, such as exclusion, invalidation, or rejection; the resulting "symptoms" such as anxiety, shame, hypervigilance, and avoidance are conceptualized as coping strategies called threat responses. By addressing one or more of power imbalances, perception of threat, meaning-making and threat responses, interventions have the potential to make gym anxiety more manageable by addressing some of its root causes, either in individual interventions or at wider group level, including by changes that can be made to specific gym settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.