ReviewFrontiers in neuroergonomics2026
Physiological sensing for situational awareness: a theory-driven integrative review of multimodal and unsupervised approaches for visual search and human-autonomy teaming.
Review in Frontiers in neuroergonomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Situational awareness (SA) is fundamental to performance in visually demanding, safety-critical tasks and in human-autonomy teaming (HAT), yet existing measurement approaches remain limited. Direct probes such as SAGAT or SART disrupt task flow, while performance-based metrics capture outcomes rather than the underlying cognitive processes of perception, comprehension, and projection. This article presents a theory-driven integrative review of physiological sensing approaches for estimating SA. Physiological sensing provides a complementary, continuous, and objective alternative, with evidence that neural (EEG), ocular (eye tracking and pupillometry), and autonomic (ECG and EDA) signals each index distinct components of SA. The review synthesizes findings across these modalities with emphasis on two key domains: visual search tasks, where operators must detect, classify, and assess potential threats, and human-autonomy teaming, where effective coordination depends on shared SA, trust, and transparency. Beyond traditional feature-based pipelines, we examine recent advances in multimodal fusion and deep learning, highlighting the increasing role of unsupervised and self-supervised representation learning. These approaches exploit large volumes of unlabeled physiological data to reveal latent cross-modal structure, reduce reliance on sparse ground-truth labels, and enhance scalability and ecological validity. By integrating evidence across sensing modalities and computational frameworks, this review outlines the current state of physiological SA estimation and identifies key research directions for continuous, real-time monitoring in visual search and human-autonomy teaming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.