Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137235›Full record

ArticleNational science review2026

Peijian Shi, Yi Li, Junfeng Duan, Xin Jiang, Ziyu Peng, Runguang Li, Bodong Tan, Xiaohan Wang, Yiheng Ruan, Baocheng Nie and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Peijian ShiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Yi LiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Junfeng DuanSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Xin JiangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Ziyu PengSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Runguang LiInstitute for Frontier Materials, Deakin University, Geelong 3216, Australia.
Bodong TanSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Xiaohan WangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Yiheng RuanSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Baocheng NieDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Bangfei ZhouSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Hui LiLaboratory for Microstructures, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Shilei LiState Key Laboratory of Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.
Yunbo ZhongSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
C T LiuDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
En Evan MaCenter for Alloy Innovation and Design (CAID), State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct manufacturing of alloys through casting is economical, user-friendly and conducive to near-net-shape processing, and therefore of great application interest. However, as-cast alloys are rarely used directly because, without post-cast thermomechanical treatments, the solidification product is susceptible to coarse grains, compositional segregation and particularly unsatisfying precipitates, which tend towards inadequate strength and brittleness. These ubiquitous disadvantages have, for a long time, seriously hindered practical applications. Here, through screening by using thermodynamic calculations and calorimetric monitoring, we successfully landed non-equiatomic NiCoCrAlTaZrB complex-concentrated alloys (CCAs) to realize

Indexed as

as-castcommercial alloyscomplex-concentrated alloysdirect manufacturingin situ nanoprecipitationstrength−ductility combinations

Identifiers

PMID42137235
PMCPMC13170801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.