ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Intra- and peritumoral radiomics for predicting equivocal HER2 status of breast cancer on contrast-enhanced mammography.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Identification of Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is significant for the treatment and prognosis of breast cancer patients. The study aimed to evaluate the equivocal HER2 (IHC 2+) status of breast cancer using intra- and peritumoral radiomics features of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). Methods: A total of 131 breast cancer patients with equivocal HER2 (IHC 2+) status of breast cancer were enrolled in the study and divided into training (n=84), internal test (n=22) and prospective test (n=25) cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from intratumoral and peritumoral regions on CEM and were selected using low variance and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO). Five radiomics signatures were established based on different intratumoral and peritumoral regions. The nomogram was constructed using the selected signatures and clinical factors by logistic regression analysis. Its predictive performance was compared with the radiomics model and the clinical model. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, the calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate predictive performance of the models. Results: The intratumoral signature, 5mm-peritumoral signature, and tumor diameter were used to establish nomogram. Compared to the radiomics model and the clinical model, the nomogram achieved optimal predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.893 in the internal test cohort and an AUC of 0.840 in the prospective test cohort. The calibration curves and DCA showed favorable predictive performance of the nomogram. Conclusions: The nomogram incorporated the intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics signatures of CEM and clinical risk variables has the potential to predict equivocal HER2 (IHC 2+) status of breast cancer preoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.