ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Study on risk stratification and treatment strategy of blood indicators in patients with moderate risk of GIST.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intermediate-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients exhibit marked prognostic heterogeneity. The traditional NIH risk classification often results in undertreatment of latent high-risk patients and overtreatment of truly low-risk ones. This study aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning model integrating hematologic inflammatory markers to achieve precise risk re-stratification and optimize adjuvant therapy strategies for intermediate-risk patients. Methods: Primary GIST patients were retrospectively enrolled. LASSO regression was applied to select key features from eight inflammatory markers (including NLR, PLR, and SII). A random survival forest model was then constructed, followed by 5-fold cross-validation. SHAP values were used to interpret feature contributions, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to evaluate stratification performance. Results: LASSO regression identified seven inflammatory markers, among which PLR, SII, and PIV were the top three key variables. The optimal random survival forest model (five-feature model) achieved an AUC of 0.777, with an internally validated mean AUC of 0.782 (95% CI: 0.679-0.878) and an out-of-bag (OOB) error of 0.124. SHAP analysis revealed that PLR, NLR, and PAR were the major contributors to model prediction. The model effectively stratified intermediate-risk patients into "intermediate-high-risk" and "intermediate-low-risk" subgroups with significantly different survival outcomes (p<0.0001). Conclusion: This study represents the first construction of an interpretable predictive model integrating blood-based inflammatory markers with machine learning algorithms. The model accurately identifies occult high-risk individuals among patients with intermediate-risk GIST, thereby providing exploratory evidence and a foundation for hypothesis generation for future individualized management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.