ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
A quantitative framework for stroke difficulty in table tennis beginners: multidimensional analysis and implications for training.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study systematically investigates the key factors influencing the difficulty of table tennis stroke tasks for beginners, aiming to establish a quantitative framework to inform evidence-based training design. Methods: Ten right-handed novice participants (mean age 21.6 ± 1.35 years) with no prior professional training completed 15 distinct ball-return tasks, each involving 20 trials. The independent variables were ball speed, frequency, height, and landing point, while the dependent variable was hitting performance. Task difficulty was quantified using a standardized difficulty coefficient formula, Results: Ball speed had the most profound impact on task difficulty, with performance declining sharply at 11.5 m/s (difficulty coefficient = 0.85). Increased ball frequency and spatial variability in landing points also significantly elevated difficulty. Ball height exhibited a threshold effect, where difficulty remained low within 7-44 cm but increased drastically at 170 cm. Regression analyses confirmed significant linear relationships between these parameters and the difficulty coefficient. Conclusion: The findings provide a quantitative reference for the functional task difficulty faced by beginners and offer empirical support for developing structured, evidence-based table tennis training programs. The proposed difficulty coefficient serves as a practical metric for task calibration. Future research should incorporate ball spin to enhance ecological validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.