Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137077›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Clarifying TID and TD in sport: an integrative phase-based framework of talent assessment and promotion.

Fabienne Döringer, Mark Pfeiffer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fabienne DöringerDepartment of Theory and Practice of Sports, Institute of Sports Science, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Mark PfeifferDepartment of Theory and Practice of Sports, Institute of Sports Science, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on Talent Identification (TID), and Talent Development (TD) in sport has produced a diverse body of theoretical frameworks, empirical findings, and practice-oriented models addressing different aspects of long-term athlete development. While these contributions have substantially advanced understanding of talent-related processes, they vary in their conceptual focus, level of analysis, and use of phase terminology. As a result, empirical findings are often difficult to compare systematically and to situate clearly within the overall process. The present paper proposes an integrative, phase-based framework for Talent Identification and Development that aims to support clearer conceptual alignment between assessment and promotion across the pathway from talent detection to talent verification. Drawing on insights from sport science, developmental psychology, and established diagnostic and developmental models, the framework distinguishes five interconnected phases: talent detection, talent orientation, talent identification, talent selection, and talent verification. Across all phases, assessment and promotion are conceptualized as parallel and continuously interacting dimensions rather than as sequential steps. A central feature of the framework is its explicit consideration of the phase-specific meaning of talent and the changing relevance of assessment-related characteristics and promotion priorities over time. The framework emphasizes that predictive validity is inherently phase-dependent and provides a structured basis for situating empirical findings within their appropriate developmental context. Rather than offering prescriptive solutions or new predictors of future performance, the framework integrates existing theoretical, empirical, and practice-oriented approaches into a coherent process structure. The proposed framework has implications for both research and practice. For research, it offers a reference system that supports phase-sensitive interpretation of findings and encourages longitudinal, context-aware, and person-centered approaches to studying talent development. For practice, it provides a conceptual tool for reflecting on the alignment between assessment decisions and promotion structures within talent systems. Overall, the framework seeks to contribute to a more coherent, developmentally informed, and integrative understanding of talent assessment and promotion in sport.

Indexed as

integrative frameworktalent assessmenttalent developmenttalent identificationtalent in sporttalent promotion

Identifiers

PMID42137077
PMCPMC13168134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.