ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Improving Documentation of Language Interpreter Use to Increase Compliance, Quality, and Safety.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Increasing Interpreter Use for Pediatric Cardiology Units: A Quality Improvement Initiative.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The standard of care for language interpretation in healthcare encounters is well established and supported by civil rights law and hospital policy. However, the use of language interpreters for healthcare communication is inconsistent for families who use languages other than English. To promote interpreter use and improve compliance, a quality improvement team implemented a project to enhance documentation of interpreter use in clinical notes. Methods: The team developed a rule-based electronic health record tool to prompt documentation of interpreter use for the right patient at the right time. The team piloted and revised the tool in a primary care setting, and then implemented and disseminated it in a more complex inpatient pediatric hospital setting. The team measured compliance with documentation in hospital pediatric history and physical and discharge summary notes using statistical process control p-charts. Balancing measures included the authors' time spent documenting interpreter use and perceived difficulty in documenting in the clinical notes. Results: On the hospital pediatrics service, the rate of compliant documentation in history and physical notes increased from 15% to 74% and was sustained for 14 months. Compliant documentation for discharge summary notes increased from 11% to 93% and sustained for 14 months. Conclusions: Electronic health record tools designed to document interpreter use can effectively prompt and monitor compliance through integrated and rule-based systems. Thus, they are essential for comprehensive quality improvement initiatives that encourage clinicians to use language interpreters and optimize communication, quality, and safety for children and families who use languages other than English.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.