ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Improving Infant Continuity of Care in an Academic Center Clinic: A Quality Improvement Project.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Continuity of care (COC) with an identified provider is a key principle of the patient-centered medical home. COC may be impacted by other activities that providers practicing in an academic center must engage in. The disruption of care processes during the COVID-19 pandemic led to a decrease in COC for infants attending our academic center's primary care clinic. We implemented a quality improvement (QI) project to improve the rates of infant COC. Methods: In 2021, we implemented a QI project with the aim of increasing the percentage of 12-month-old infants who had seen the same provider for at least 3 of the recommended 6 well-child checks in infancy. QI methodology was used to determine root causes of the problem, which included access, scheduling, and the patient-provider relationship. Process measures included tracking scheduled future well checks for newborns and 4-month-old infants, as well as establishing a medical home provider. Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were implemented, including scheduling well visits at newborn hospital discharge, scheduling by clinic nurses, and establishing the family's preferred medical home provider. Results: The percentage of infants seeing the same provider for at least 3 well visits in the first year of life increased from a baseline of 9% in July 2021 to 60% in June 2023. This was sustained through December 2023. Conclusions: An outpatient QI project to improve infant COC was successfully implemented with sustained outcomes. Next steps include evaluating the effect of these interventions on future continuity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.