ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Reduced Intravenous Vancomycin Use and Cost Savings in a Pediatric Hemodialysis Unit: A Quality Report.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intravenous (IV) vancomycin is used in patients receiving chronic hemodialysis (HD) for the treatment of central venous catheter-related infections. Excessive use of IV vancomycin leads to high costs and an increase in multidrug-resistant organisms. Our primary aim was to reduce IV vancomycin use for suspected central venous catheter-related infections in our pediatric chronic HD unit by 50% within 1 year. Our secondary aim was to reduce the total cost of IV vancomycin use by 50%. Methods: With a quality improvement framework, the key interventions include (1) provider education on antibiotic stewardship, related to IV vancomycin and its associated risks; (2) identification of alternative topical/enteral antibiotics; (3) development and implementation of an exit-site scoring tool; and (4) development of a treatment-based algorithm to standardize choice of antibiotic related to exit-site score. Results: We used a statistical process control chart to demonstrate that IV vancomycin use declined from an average of 24 doses per 1,000 patient-days in the preintervention period (August 1, 2018, to August 31, 2019) to 5.1 vancomycin doses per 1,000 patient-days in the postintervention period (September 1, 2019, to July 31, 2020). Additionally, the IV vancomycin cost decreased from $81,297 per 1,000 patient-days during the preintervention period to $14,053 per 1,000 patient-days during the postintervention period. Conclusions: A stepwise incorporation of interventions, including education, the development of a novel exit-site scoring tool, and a treatment-based algorithm, resulted in a 78% decrease in IV vancomycin use in our pediatric chronic HD unit within 1 year and an 82% decrease in associated costs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.