ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Isokinetic dynamometry assessment of the transition period between eccentric and concentric hamstring contractions in athletes with a history of hamstring injury.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hamstring (Hs) injuries are frequent in sports involving explosive efforts. While eccentric deficits and strength imbalances are known risk factors, the role of the transition period between eccentric and concentric contractions remains unexplored. Objective: To determine whether the transition period between eccentric and concentric contractions of the hamstrings, measured using an isokinetic dynamometer, differs between athletes with a history of Hs injury and healthy controls. Methods: This observational retrospective study included 57 participants (26 previously injured athletes and 31 healthy controls) assessed with standard and plyometric isokinetic tests. The primary outcome was the transition period between eccentric (30°/s) and concentric (240°/s) Hs contractions. Secondary outcomes included torque measurements and calculated ratios (Croisier and Plyometric). Results: The transition period did not differ significantly between groups. Injured athletes demonstrated higher concentric Hs peak torque at 240°/s ( Conclusion: The transition period, as measured by isokinetic testing, does not appear to be influenced by a prior Hs injury and may lack clinical utility in guiding rehabilitation. However, plyometric evaluation may help reveal residual eccentric deficits in previously injured athletes. Future studies using electrophysiological techniques could provide more precise insight into neuromuscular latency during explosive efforts. Levels of evidence: 3b.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.