ArticleFarmaceuticos comunitarios2026
Design of a Pharmaceutical Protocol for the Evaluation of Phytotherapeutic Products.
Article in Farmaceuticos comunitarios, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The growing use of phytotherapy and the increasing heterogeneity of available formulations require community pharmacists to critically assess marketed products based on criteria of quality, safety, and efficacy. Objectives: To design an operational protocol to support community pharmacists in the evaluation and decision-making process regarding plant-based products. Methods: A consensus process was conducted by the SEFAC Fitoterapia Commission, involving the development and integration of structured checklists and the selection of open-access data sources. A decision tree was defined, starting from the legal classification, and an analytical framework for product evaluation was established. Finally, a rapid reporting template was designed for use in community pharmacy practice. Results: The resulting protocol provides a structured approach to the evaluation of phytotherapeutic products, organized into five sections and a rapid report. It is based on a sequential assessment of legal classification, scientific evidence, quality, safety, and patient information. Its implementation is supported by official, reliable, and openly accessible databases available to community pharmacists. Conclusions: The proposed protocol facilitates consistent and traceable pharmaceutical decision-making by integrating regulatory and scientific information into a practical and applicable tool for community pharmacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.