ArticleAnesthesiology research and practice2026
Comparison of the Effects of Intranasal and Oral Midazolam Premedication on Sedation and Separation From Parents for Pediatric Patients.
Article in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of the Effects of Intranasal and Oral Midazolam Premedication on Sedation and Separation From Parents for Pediatric Patients.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of intranasal and oral midazolam administered for premedication to children of preschool age on hemodynamic parameters, sedation, and separation from parents. Method: A prospective, randomized, single-blind design was adopted, including 60 children aged 2-6 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. Participants were randomly assigned into two equal groups using a sealed-envelope randomization technique (Group O, Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of mean age, sex, height, and weight. In Group N, 11/30 (36%) of patients had different types of nasal irritation identified. In both groups, sedation score values examined in the 10th minute were significantly high compared to the initial values. No statistical significance was observed for the other values. There was no statistically significant difference observed for the mean separation from parents scores in Group N and Group O examined in the 20th minute ( Conclusion: In our study, 0.25 mg/kg intranasal midazolam and 0.5 mg/kg oral midazolam, administered to children from 2 to 6 years for premedication, were effective methods, with no significant differences between the two kinds of administration in terms of sedation or separation from parents. Due to the nasal irritation emerging in patients with nasal administration, oral midazolam was evaluated as a more preferable method.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.