ArticleJournal of public health research2026
Global governance strategies for managing NCDs in the context of climate change: Protocol of scoping review.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are responsible for over 70% of the global mortality, disproportionately affecting low-and middle-income countries. Simultaneously, climate change is escalating health risks by intensifying climate-related hazards and climate-mediated environmental risk factors that affect NCD prevention and management, including extreme heat, air pollution, and food insecurity. These dual crises increasingly intersect and demand integrated policy response. Objective: This scoping review protocol outlines a systematic approach to map, examine, and analyze global strategies, policies, programs, and management models for NCD prevention and control in the context of climate change. It will evaluate how climate and environmental factors are incorporated into health system governance, implementation, and performance, and identify gaps for strengthening NCD strategies. Methods: Following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and relevant gray literature sources. Studies and reports from 2004 to 2025 that focus on NCD-related policies with explicit reference to climate change will be included. Data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers and synthesized thematically to identify common approaches, challenges, and innovations. Expected outcomes: This review will map existing global practices, highlighting integrated policy components, implementation levels, and reported outcomes. It will also identify knowledge gaps and inform the development of climate-resilient NCD strategies, particularly in vulnerable regions. Conclusion: As climate change and NCDs converge into a global syndemic, understanding integrated health-system responses is crucial. This review will support policymakers in designing effective context-specific interventions to build resilient and sustainable healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.