ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Accuracy of rapid microcapillary direct antibiotic susceptibility testing for urine samples collected with bacteriostatic boric acid from patients with suspected urinary tract infection.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) results are needed more rapidly to support antimicrobial stewardship and improve patient outcomes. Diagnostic microbiology laboratories receive hundreds of urine samples daily from patients with suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) in both community and inpatient settings. Bacteriostatic boric acid preserves microbial contents during transport but may interfere with rapid AST methods. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of rapid microcapillary direct-from-urine (RMD) AST with suspected UTI patient urine, and to determine whether RMD AST is affected by boric acid. Methods: The overall accuracy of RMD AST was assessed with 352 diagnostic remnant urine samples collected with boric acid, for seven first-line antibiotics (ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, trimethoprim, nitrofurantoin, ciprofloxacin, cefalexin and cefoxitin). A further 90 urine samples were tested in duplicate with or without addition of bacteriostatic. Results: RMD AST showed a concordance with the reference method of 572/590 bacteria/antibiotic combinations (96.95%) for urine samples containing a single organism. The mean time to AST result was 5.85 h. When duplicate samples with or without boric acid were directly compared there was a categorical agreement of 158/160 (98.75%). Conclusions: The overall high accuracy of RMD AST for determining antimicrobial susceptibility to seven first-line antibiotics for UTI shows this method can deliver rapid results-without requiring additional processing-for urine samples routinely collected with boric acid from suspected UTI patients. The close agreement between duplicates with or without boric acid confirms this rapid direct method is unaffected by bacteriostatic collection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.