ArticleDigital health
An artificial intelligence model for the diagnosis of otitis media with effusion in children.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of otitis media with effusion (OME) requires substantial training and experience in otoscopic examination of children. Objective: This study developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict OME diagnosis in children. Methods: The source data were images of pediatric patients' tympanic membranes obtained by otoendoscopy. A convolutional neural network was used in machine learning. The diagnostic features of the tympanic membrane, as labelled by the experts, and the surgical findings served as the ground truth. InceptionV4 built the final model. The model was trained using the Adaptive Moment Estimation optimizer with an initial learning rate of 0.0001 and a total duration of 100 epochs. The batch size was 32. The Categorical Cross-Entropy loss function was employed for the internal validation. The outcome was to distinguish between OME and normal tympanic membrane. A confusion matrix was used to assess the model's performance. The model was tested for agreement with otolaryngologists and implemented as a web application. Results: The initial sample size was 320 pictures. For OME, the model achieved an accuracy of 94.7% (95% CI 0.88, 1). The F1 score was 96% (95% CI 0.89, 1), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98 (95% CI 0.93, 1). The kappa agreement between AI and experienced otolaryngologists was 0.627 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: An AI diagnostic model for otitis media with effusion had good accuracy and moderate agreement with otolaryngologists. The model should be helpful for preliminary diagnosis, telemedicine, or educational purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.