ArticleDigital health
Multi-strategy feature selection and multi-model machine learning for prognostic prediction in primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PG-DLBCL) exhibits heterogeneous outcomes, and conventional prognostic systems often fail to capture its unique clinicopathological features. We aimed to develop a robust, interpretable prognostic model to improve risk stratification and guide individualized management. Methods: Data from 3773 PG-DLBCL patients (2000-2021) were extracted from the SEER database. Four complementary feature selection strategies-LASSO, Boruta, backward stepwise elimination, and best subset regression (BSR)-were employed to identify stable prognostic variables. Four machine learning (ML) algorithms (logistic regression, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, and XGBoost) were trained using these selected variables. Model performance was evaluated through discrimination (AUC), calibration, decision curve analysis, and internal validation. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were applied for interpretability, and patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups. Results: Age, stage, chemotherapy, marital status, and income emerged as key prognostic determinants. The XGBoost model based on BSR-selected predictors achieved the highest performance with good calibration and net clinical benefit. SHAP analysis demonstrated that older age, advanced stage and absence of chemotherapy increased predicted risk, whereas marital status and higher income were protective. Risk stratification effectively distinguished survival outcomes in training and testing cohorts (p < 0.001). A web-based tool was developed for individualized risk assessment. Conclusions: We established an interpretable, high-performing ML-based prognostic model for PG-DLBCL that integrates clinical, treatment, and socioeconomic factors. This tool enables precise risk stratification, supports individualized therapeutic decisions, and provides a methodological framework for prognostic modeling in this rare extranodal lymphomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.