Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42136916›Full record

ReviewJRSM cardiovascular disease

Databases and registries recording the usage of cardiovascular implantable medical devices: A rapid review of the literature.

Patrícia V Marrone, Maria Lr Pinho Dias Scoton, Milana L Dos Santos, Fabio R Mathias, Irineu F Delfino Silva Massaia, Eduardo M Dias

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JRSM cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrícia V MarroneFaculty of Economics, Administration, Accounting and Actuarial Science of the University of São Paulo (FEA-USP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5631-5587
Maria Lr Pinho Dias ScotonDepartment of Energy Engineering and Electrical Automation-Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo (POLI USP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7651-3991
Milana L Dos SantosDepartment of Energy Engineering and Electrical Automation-Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo (POLI USP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2680-5141
Fabio R MathiasDepartment of Energy Engineering and Electrical Automation-Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo (POLI USP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0789-0723
Irineu F Delfino Silva MassaiaPathology of Infectious Disease Unit of School of Medicine, University of São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas Medicine School (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5584-9245
Eduardo M DiasDepartment of Energy Engineering and Electrical Automation-Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo (POLI USP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2104-1747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implantable Medical Devices (IMDs) are essential for ensuring the quality of life in patients. They also play a crucial role in terms of the costs associated with surgical procedures, as well as incurring potential risks requiring continuous monitoring following implantation. Objective: The aim of this systematic review of public health intervention was to determine which countries collect data on the utilization of implantable cardiovascular medical devices (IMD-Cs), and how countries record the captured data. We identified parameters for comparing the use of IMD-Cs among countries that could serve as an example for Latin American countries. Method: A Rapid Systematic Review of the literature through a survey using three search engines was carried out between July and August 2024. Eligible studies measured the annual use of IMD-Cs based on nationwide data published between January 2014 and August 2024. Data were synthesized using tables and an analytical approach. Results: From 1602 identified publications, 23 studies measuring the use of IMD-Cs were selected. This made it possible to map the sites where national records repositories are located and the type of data held therein. Conclusions: Many countries collect countrywide information on IMD-Cs and use a variety of methods to register/record the data. There are substantial advantages for a country with IMD-C registries, including monitoring access to IMD-Cs; tracking the costs of the devices; assessing the levels of incorporation of relevant new technologies; and helping improve medical and nursing protocols.

Indexed as

cardiac rehabilitationcardiac resynchronization therapy devicesimplantable defibrillatorsRegistriesstatistics and numerical datausageuseutilization

Identifiers

PMID42136916
PMCPMC13167271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.