ReviewJRSM cardiovascular disease
Databases and registries recording the usage of cardiovascular implantable medical devices: A rapid review of the literature.
Review in JRSM cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implantable Medical Devices (IMDs) are essential for ensuring the quality of life in patients. They also play a crucial role in terms of the costs associated with surgical procedures, as well as incurring potential risks requiring continuous monitoring following implantation. Objective: The aim of this systematic review of public health intervention was to determine which countries collect data on the utilization of implantable cardiovascular medical devices (IMD-Cs), and how countries record the captured data. We identified parameters for comparing the use of IMD-Cs among countries that could serve as an example for Latin American countries. Method: A Rapid Systematic Review of the literature through a survey using three search engines was carried out between July and August 2024. Eligible studies measured the annual use of IMD-Cs based on nationwide data published between January 2014 and August 2024. Data were synthesized using tables and an analytical approach. Results: From 1602 identified publications, 23 studies measuring the use of IMD-Cs were selected. This made it possible to map the sites where national records repositories are located and the type of data held therein. Conclusions: Many countries collect countrywide information on IMD-Cs and use a variety of methods to register/record the data. There are substantial advantages for a country with IMD-C registries, including monitoring access to IMD-Cs; tracking the costs of the devices; assessing the levels of incorporation of relevant new technologies; and helping improve medical and nursing protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.