Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42136848›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

From memorisation to reasoning: a qualitative study of first-year medical students' cognitive shifts in computer science education.

Omar Alobud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Omar AlobudKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many students enter medical school having achieved prior academic success primarily through memorisation-based learning strategies. This study explored how first-year medical student's shift from memorisation-based approaches toward problem-solving and reasoning-based strategies when encountering an introductory computer science course that resists recall-oriented learning. Methods: A qualitative interview study was conducted with 12 first-year medical students enrolled in a mandatory computer science course. Semi-structured interviews explored students' learning approaches, experiences when familiar strategies proved inadequate, and development of alternative cognitive strategies. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Four interconnected themes emerged: reliance on memorisation at course entry, early failure using recall-based strategies, shift toward stepwise problem-solving, and increased focus on process over correct answers. Students initially attempted to memorise programming syntax and examples as they would any other academic content, but discovered that recall did not translate into the ability to write functioning code. Through repeated failures and iterative experimentation, students gradually developed approaches emphasising logical reasoning, systematic problem decomposition, and constructive engagement with tasks rather than reproduction of memorised information. Conclusion: The shift from memorisation to problem-solving represents a fundamental reconceptualisation of what learning involves, rather than simply acquiring new study techniques. Programming tasks inherently resist memorisation strategies, creating conditions where cognitive adaptation becomes necessary. Medical curricula should consider incorporating early learning experiences that require reasoning and problem-solving rather than recall, helping students develop cognitive flexibility before encountering high-stakes clinical contexts.

Indexed as

cognitive strategiesmedical educationmemorisationproblem-solvingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42136848
PMCPMC13167560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.