ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Work meaning in medicine: a comparative investigation across training stages.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Work orientations (i.e., the meaning individuals attribute to the purpose of their work) are established predictors of work-related wellbeing in the general population. This investigation examined an expanded model of work orientations (i.e., calling, job, career, social embeddedness, and busyness) in the medical profession. It compared physicians, residents, and clinical-year medical students across six indicators for work-related wellbeing: person-environment fit, work satisfaction, work engagement, burnout, turnover intentions, and commitment to the profession. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to 198 participants from Israel, including physicians, residents, and clinical-year medical students. Measures included a work orientations questionnaire, indicators of work-related wellbeing, and a demographic questionnaire. Group differences were examined using analyses of variance (ANOVAs), and Pearson correlations were computed to assess associations between work orientations and work-related wellbeing indicators. Results: Calling was the most strongly endorsed orientation across all groups. Medical students reported higher calling than residents, and higher career and social embeddedness than physicians. Calling was most consistently associated with work-related wellbeing across the stages of the medical profession, whereas the associations of social embeddedness and busyness with wellbeing were most notable among residents and students. Discussion: These findings underscore the developmental nature of the associations between work orientations and work-related wellbeing in medicine, offering implications for both theory and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.