ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Developing a carotid ultrasound radiomics-semantic fusion model to identify aortic dissection: a two-center retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency. Preventive strategies with proven efficacy remain limited, and early identification and timely diagnostic workup are critical. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a fusion model integrating carotid ultrasound radiomic features with clinical and ultrasound semantic variables to discriminate AD from non-AD participants in a retrospective case-control setting. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 209 participants and randomly allocated them to training and test cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Additionally, we selected 39 external participants as the validation set. We developed three diagnostic models: a carotid artery ultrasound radiomic model, a semantic model, and a fusion model combining both approaches. Subsequently, we compared the diagnostic efficacy of the three models. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) metrics for the semantic, radiomic, and fusion models demonstrated values of 0.73, 0.84, and 0.94, respectively, in the training set, with corresponding values of 0.73, 0.87, and 0.93 in the test set. In the external validation set, the AUCs of the three models were 0.71, 0.81, and 0.91, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in discriminative performance between the fusion model and other models ( Conclusion: Carotid ultrasound radiomics and semantic features showed diagnostic value for distinguishing AD from non-AD participants. The fusion model further improved discriminative performance, supporting future prospective multicenter studies to evaluate clinical utility in real-world triage workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.