Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42136778›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026

Optimizing Resource Utilization in Low- and Middle-Income Country NICUs: A Clinical Audit of Surgical Infection Screening Practices at a High-Volume NICU in Pakistan.

Humza Thobani, Rafia Durrani, Muhammad Osama Khan, Javeria Javed, Sulaiman Sajjad, Zahra Iftikhar, Muhammad Aqil Soomro, Saqib Qazi, Faraz Ali Khan, Saleem Islam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Humza ThobaniDr. Humza Thobani, MBBS. Section of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto CA.
Rafia DurraniDr. Rafia Durrani, MBBS, Section of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Osama KhanDr. Muhammad Osama Khan, MBBS. Section of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Javeria JavedDr. Javeria Javed, MBBS. Section of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sulaiman SajjadSulaiman Sajjad, School of Medicine, Imperial College of London, United Kingdom.
Zahra IftikharDr. Zahra Iftikhar, MBBS. Section of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Aqil SoomroDr. Muhammad Aqil Soomro, FCPS. Section of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Saqib QaziDr. Saqib Qazi, FCPS. Section of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Faraz Ali KhanDr. Faraz Ali Khan, MD. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto CA.
Saleem IslamDr. Saleem Islam, MD, MPH. Section of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Post operative sepsis in neonates is a serious problem that may be challenging to diagnose. It is standard practice at our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Pakistan to perform routine Blood Cultures (BLCS) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) to screen for post-operative sepsis. We aimed to review this practice to investigate its effectiveness at screening for post-operative sepsis. Methodology: All neonates admitted to the NICU post-operatively at our center from 2017-2022 were included. Relevant clinical and demographic data were collected. The sensitivity of BLCS was calculated for each post-operative day (POD) and an ROC curve was constructed for overall CRP values to quantify their screening value. Results: A total of 109 post-operative neonates were included (median gestational age 37 weeks, birth weight 2.4kg). Thirteen (12.6%) developed sepsis. Only two patients had pathological microbe growth on POD 0 or 1, both having growth preoperatively. BLCS sensitivity increased significantly after POD 2. CRP performed poorly at discriminating post-operative sepsis (AUROC=0.55). Conclusion: Routine BLCS performed immediately after surgery did not predict the onset of post-operative sepsis. CRP performed poorly at discriminating post-operative sepsis, likely due to physiologic inflammation in post-operative neonates. Unnecessary screening tests represent a significant financial burden in LMICs, with little clear clinical benefit.

Indexed as

Blood cultureCRPNeonatesNICUSurgical infections

Identifiers

PMID42136778
PMCPMC13169989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.