ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
Intentional Replantation - Small procedure, big benefits: A report of five cases.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intentional replantation (IR) is a conservative endodontic procedure that may offer predictable results when conventional non-surgical endodontic treatment (NSET) or retreatment fails. The aim of the present report was to describe the management and outcomes of five cases of persistent apical periodontitis treated successfully with IR after failed NSET or retreatment. All the cases underwent IR involving atraumatic extraction, 3 mm root-end resection, retrograde cavity preparation, and sealing with intermediate restorative material (IRM), followed by replantation and stabilization with flexible splints or sutures. Extraoral working time was maintained under 10 minutes to preserve periodontal ligament vitality. Follow-up periods ranged from six months to two years. All replanted teeth remained functional, asymptomatic, and radiographically stable, showing progressive or complete resolution of periapical radiolucencies. No adverse events such as ankylosis, replacement resorption, or persistent infection were observed. The favourable outcomes are attributed to careful case selection, minimal extraoral manipulation, and the use of IRM as a reliable retrograde filling material. This series emphasizes intentional replantation as a minimally invasive, cost-effective, and biologically sound alternative to extraction or endodontic microsurgery for the preservation of natural dentition in challenging cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.