ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026
Comparison of the Bond Strength of Silane-Treated Glass Fiber Posts at Different Solvent Evaporation Times: An In Vitro Study.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Silane is used as a coupling agent on glass fiber posts to enhance chemical interaction at the post-resin cement interface. This in vitro study evaluated the bond strength of silane-treated glass fiber posts at different solvent evaporation times. Material and Methods: This in vitro experimental study included forty single-rooted mandibular premolars assigned to four groups according to silane solvent evaporation time: G1 (control), G2 (60 s), G3 (120 s), and G4 (180 s). Specimens were stored in physiological saline at 37 °C. After endodontic treatment, root canals were prepared and glass fiber posts were cemented. In the experimental groups, silane was applied and allowed to evaporate for the allotted time. After cementation, the roots were sectioned into thirds (coronal, middle, and apical) and bond strength was determined using the push-out test on a universal testing machine. Welch's ANOVA with Games-Howell post hoc was used to compare groups. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: In the middle third, significant differences were observed between evaporation times (p < 0.001), with higher values for 180 s (13.94 ± 6.59 MPa) versus 60 s (3.86 ± 2.04 MPa; p = 0.004), 120 s (3.30 ± 1.85 MPa; p = 0.003) and control (4.69 ± 2.95 MPa; p = 0.007). In the coronal third (control: 7.09 ± 3.00 MPa; 60 s: 7.22 ± 3.16 MPa; 120 s: 4.81 ± 2.05 MPa; 180 s: 8.01 ± 4.34 MPa) and in the apical third (control: 6.49 ± 3.09 MPa; 60 s: 5.56 ± 1.96 MPa; 120 s: 5.19 ± 3.98 MPa; 180 s: 8.10 ± 3.40 MPa) no significant differences were detected between protocols (p = 0.164 and p = 0.196, respectively). When comparing root thirds within each protocol, only the 60 s group showed differences, with higher bond strength in the coronal third than in the middle third (p = 0.032). Conclusions: Evaporation of the silane solvent for 180 s improved the bond strength of the glass fiber posts in the middle root third, while no significant differences were detected in the coronal and apical thirds between the times evaluated. Within protocols, the 60 s group showed lower bond strength in the middle third than in the coronal third. Taken together, these findings suggest that prolonging evaporation to 180 s may be a useful operative adjustment to optimize bonding in the middle third, with no evidence of consistent benefit in the coronal and apical regions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.