ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2026
Development and Validation of a Canadian Prediction Equation for Incident CKD Using Population-Based, Administrative Data.
Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Identifying individuals at risk for incident chronic kidney disease (CKD; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m Objective: Develop and validate prediction equations to identify individuals at risk of incident CKD using routinely collected administrative data with and without urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR). Design: This is a retrospective cohort study using administrative data. Setting: This study was conducted in Manitoba and Ontario, Canada. Patients: This study included 413 948 adults (18 or older) with an eGFR > 70 mL/min/1.73 m Measurements: Routinely available variables (demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values) in administrative data sets were used to predict the outcome of incident CKD (stage G3+) defined by a single outpatient eGFR measure <60 mL/min/1.73 m Methods: Time-to-event models, accounting for the competing risk of death, were used to predict new-onset CKD from one to nine years with a data-driven model reduction. Prediction equations stratifying individuals with and without ACR measurements were derived internally and externally validated. Results: Among individuals from Manitoba [53% women, mean (SD) age 51 (17), mean (SD) baseline eGFR 95 (14) mL/min/1.73 m Limitations: Only individuals with measures of all model predictors (complete case analysis) were included. Conclusion: Equations using routinely collected population-level, administrative data variables can accurately predict the onset of CKD with or without ACR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.