ArticlePolish journal of radiology2026
An automated tuberculosis detection approach using deep learning and machine learning techniques from chest X-ray images: a step towards effective diagnosis.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Tuberculosis (TB) is a severe bacterial infectious lung disease. Millions of people die or experience severe health complications due to TB each year. Accurate, automated, and effective detection of TB is key to curing and preventing person-to-person transmission. In this regard, deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) techniques applied to chest X-ray (CXR) images have proved effective. Here, we present our DL- and ML-based approach for TB detection using CXR images. Material and methods: We implemented convolutional neural network (CNN)-based pre-trained DL models, such as DenseNet121, DenseNet169, DenseNet201, ResNet152, and VGG19, as feature extractors. ML models, including support vector machine (SVM), XGBoost, logistic regression, and a DL-based custom model, were used as classifiers. A total of 2,391 CXR images from three publicly available datasets were considered. Results: We found three models achieving the highest value in different evaluation metrics: accuracy (99.91%) with ResNet152 and SVM; recall (99.22%), precision (99.23%), and F1-score (99.22%) with DenseNet169 and the custom classifier; and area under the curve (99.99%) with DenseNet201 and the custom classifier. Among these models, we propose DenseNet169 with the custom classifier as the best performer for potential clinical application, as it reflected a high and well-balanced performance across all evaluation metrics. Conclusions: This study evaluated pre-trained CNN-based DL and ML models on pre-processed CXR images for the detection of TB. The DenseNet169 model with a custom classifier stands out with its high and well-balanced performance, offering a significant contribution to the effective and automated detection of TB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.