ArticlePolish journal of radiology2026
Interpretable hybrid deep learning model for Parkinson's disease screening using hand-drawn spiral and waveform images.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: It is still hard to diagnose Parkinson's disease (PD) early and correctly, since the motor symptoms are often relatively mild and there are no unique diagnostic tools. The goal of this project was to create and test a hybrid deep learning model that can accurately classify PD by using hand-drawn spiral and waveform pictures. Material and methods: A novel two-channel hybrid model was created, where the input representation combines normalised greyscale features and Canny edge features to capture both spatial and structural stroke patterns from patient drawings. The model combines a convolutional neural network (CNN) with hand-crafted grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features to enhance its performance and make it easier to understand. We trained and evaluated three different models: a baseline CNN, a fusion CNN + GLCM, and a fine-tuned ResNet-50. We did this on both the original and pre-processed datasets. Results: The hybrid CNN + GLCM model that used pre-processing had the best classification accuracy at 97.02% and worked well on datasets that were not used to train it. Statistical studies validated the importance of enhancements in performance relative to baseline models. Conclusions: The suggested technique provides a straightforward, comprehensible, and efficient approach for PD screening using easily administered drawing exercises. Its great precision and low equipment needs make it a good candidate for use in real-world clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.