ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
From
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease in which dysregulated interleukin-6 (IL-6) signaling through the IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) plays a central pathogenic role. Although monoclonal antibodies targeting this pathway are clinically effective, their use is limited by parenteral administration, high cost, and systemic immunosuppression. Peptide-based inhibitors represent a complementary strategy for modulating cytokine-receptor interactions, offering advantages in design flexibility and manufacturability. Recent advances in immunoinformatics and artificial intelligence (AI) facilitate the rational identification of peptide candidates with favorable safety profiles. Methods: We developed an integrated AI-assisted discovery pipeline incorporating immunoinformatics-based safety screening (toxicity, allergenicity, and antigenicity prediction), structural modeling, molecular docking with MM/GBSA rescoring, and 100-ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to identify IL-6R-targeting peptides. Seven candidate peptides (P01-P07) were prioritized based on predicted safety, binding energetics, and structural stability. Lead candidates were experimentally evaluated using competitive ELISA assays for IL-6/IL-6R binding and cell-based assays measuring IL-6-induced STAT3 phosphorylation. Results: Computational analyses consistently identified peptide P01 as the top-ranked candidate, exhibiting stable binding conformations, persistent hydrogen bonding at the IL-6R interface, low RMSD and RMSF values during MD simulations, and the most favorable MM/GBSA binding free energy. Conclusion: This study establishes a safety-focused, AI-driven peptide discovery framework integrating in silico prioritization with experimental validation. Peptide P01 represents a tractable early-stage IL-6R antagonist that provides a foundation for future structure-guided optimization and development as a complementary therapeutic modality for IL-6-driven inflammatory diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.