Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2026
Lanadelumab safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics in patients aged ≥12 with hereditary angioedema in China: an open-label, multicenter study.
Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05460325 (A Multi-center, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Lanadelumab), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-center, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Lanadelumab (SHP643) in Chinese Subjects With Hereditary Angioedema
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lanadelumab is a plasma kallikrein inhibitor approved in many countries, including China, for the long-term prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE). The primary objective was safety evaluation of lanadelumab for HAE long-term prophylaxis in a Chinese patient population. Secondary objectives included efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity evaluations. Methods: This open-label, prospective, phase 3, post-approval commitment study included patients in China aged ≥12 years with HAE due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH) (NCT05460325). Eligible patients with ≥1 HAE attack in the 4-week run-in period received subcutaneous lanadelumab 300 mg every 2 weeks during days 0-182 for 14 doses in total. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled (median age, 38 years; 7 male), and all completed the study. No treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were fatal, led to treatment discontinuation, or were of special interest. Fifteen (75%) patients reported ≥1 TEAE during the study, most commonly COVID-19 infection (50%). Nine (45%) patients reported treatment-related TEAEs, most frequently injection site pain (20%) and swelling (15%). Injection site reactions occurred in 25% of patients. Mean ± SD monthly rate of investigator-confirmed attacks decreased by 99.1% during days 0-182 versus run-in (0.04 ± 0.14 vs 2.50 ± 1.44). Eighteen (90%) patients were attack free during days 0-182; 2 patients experienced a total of 4 mild and 1 moderate investigator-confirmed HAE attacks. Lanadelumab pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity in Chinese patients were consistent with other patient populations. Conclusion: These findings in patients with HAE in China are consistent with the profile of lanadelumab established in patients from other regions, supporting its use as first-line long-term prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.