ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Credit risks in long-term care: a novel assessment of private long-term care institutions for sustainable development under the silver economy in China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As private long-term care institutions play an increasingly important role in meeting long-term care needs in an aging society, assessing their credit risk is essential for supporting institutional sustainability, reducing information asymmetry, and strengthening risk-aware governance under the silver economy. However, existing studies have largely focused on subjective service-quality evaluations, with limited attention to objective, interpretable institution-level assessment based on publicly available data. Using publicly available records from 594 private long-term care institutions in Hangzhou, China, this study develops and validates an interpretable machine-learning framework for credit risk assessment. The framework integrates class-imbalance handling techniques with multiple machine-learning algorithms to improve predictive performance and identify the factors most closely associated with institutional creditworthiness. The results show that XGBoost with SMOTE achieves the best overall performance among the benchmark models across accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Feature importance and SHAP analyses identify four key predictors: registered capital and the number of tax-paying employees are positively associated with predicted creditworthiness, whereas financing history and patent counts are negatively associated with it in this setting. To enhance practical applicability, the final model is deployed in a Streamlit-based web application for real-time credit rating and visualization. Overall, this study extends credit risk assessment to the long-term care sector and provides an objective, interpretable, and deployable decision-support framework for families, managers, and regulators, with implications for strengthening the sustainable governance of private long-term care institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.