ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Analysis on suicide risk in medical students, an analysis based on socio-formative conceptual mapping.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article reports a documentary research project using a conceptual mapping methodology for suicide risk in medical students, emphasizing a socio-formative approach. The purpose is to define suicide risk and, through a socio-formative approach, identify and reduce suicide risk in medical students by understanding risk factors and psychological predictors. The axes of the conceptual mapping are constructed through the analysis of scientific literature indexed in high-impact databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycINFO) published between 2015 and 2025. The results highlight the complexity and multifactorial nature of suicide risk in this vulnerable population, emphasizing the interconnectedness of individual psychological, academic, psychosocial, and institutional factors. The conceptual mapping offers a comprehensive view of the research landscape, facilitating the identification of key areas for intervention, prevention, and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.