ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
The impacts of development finance for climate on public health outcomes and life satisfaction: evidence from developing countries in the global south.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assesses how development finance for climate (DFC) affects public health outcomes and life satisfaction in developing countries across the global south (GS), using panel data for 69 developing countries from 2011 to 2021. The instrumental-variable generalized method of moments (IV-GMM) is used to address endogeneity. Several alternative approaches are used for robustness analysis. The findings provide robust evidence that increased DFC is positively associated with improvements in public health outcomes and life satisfaction in developing countries in the GS. More specifically, a 1% increase in DFC is associated with a 0.025% decrease in the crude death rate and a 0.047-point increase in the life satisfaction score, suggesting that increasing DFC to promote climate resilience and mitigation yields broader wellbeing gains beyond environmental benefits for developing countries in the GS. Moreover, heterogeneity analyses indicate that the positive effects of DFC on public health and life satisfaction are more pronounced among developing countries with low health expenditure and greater exposure to environmental risks. Additionally, the effects of DFC on public health and life satisfaction vary across income groups: middle-income countries are better able to leverage DFC to improve public health outcomes and life satisfaction than low-income developing countries. Finally, crude death rate has a significant and partial mediation role in the link between DFC and life satisfaction. Therefore, the results provide multifaceted evidence of DFC's effects on the health and social wellbeing of developing countries in the GS and offer important policy recommendations aligned with SDG-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.