Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42136565›Full record

ArticlePediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society

Standardized Placental Pathology Reporting: Improving Quality and Clinical Utility Recommendations From the Society for Pediatric Pathology Placental Pathology Reporting Task Force.

Sanjita Ravishankar, Francois Cady, Chrystalle Katte Carreon, Eumenia Castro, Virginia E Duncan, Philip J Katzman, Drucilla J Roberts, Karen K Mestan, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, Heather Florescue and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sanjita RavishankarDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7268-6000
Francois CadyCellNetix Pathology, Olympia, WA, USA.
Chrystalle Katte CarreonDepartment of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.
Eumenia CastroDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, USA.
Virginia E DuncanDepartment of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Philip J KatzmanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3822-0271
Drucilla J RobertsDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Karen K MestanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA.
Cynthia Gyamfi-BannermanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA.
Heather FlorescueDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA.
Lindsey WimmerStar Legacy Foundation, Eden Prairie, MN, USA.
Alicia A LoehleinMeasure the Placenta, Shoreview, MN, USA.
Mana ParastDepartment of Pathology, Center for Perinatal Discovery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlacental pathology has benefited greatly from the standardization of definitions provided by the Amsterdam consensus, however the quality of placental pathology reporting continues to suffer from a lack of unified and practical reporting standards and difficulty in applying the Amsterdam definitions to general clinical practice.

methodsA multidisciplinary Placental Pathology Reporting Task Force was formed to develop a standardized placental pathology reporting template based on a combination of evidence-based literature review and consensus expert opinion, and designed to complement the Amsterdam definitions. The goal of the task force was to create a practical, succinct, clinically informative, and easily customizable template that can be adapted to varying institutional preferences.

resultsThe proposed standardized reporting template encompasses a wide breadth of common placental pathologic diagnoses and provides recommended diagnostic terminology, explanatory comments and practical tips, and notes to ease the application of definitions. Input from pathologists from different practice settings, obstetric providers, neonatologists, and patient advocates was integrated.

conclusionsThe introduction of a standardized placental reporting template holds the potential to reform and advance placental pathology practice across the diverse range of settings in which it is currently performed. The proposed template is adaptable, allowing pathologists to include additional information beyond the recommended standard as needed/preferred. Widespread adoption of this framework will enhance the clinical utility and value of placental pathology reports by clinicians and patients, ultimately supporting more informed and appropriate management of neonates and future pregnancies.

Indexed as

Pathology, ClinicalPlacentaPlacenta DiseasesAdvisory CommitteesFemaleHumansPregnancyQuality ImprovementAmsterdam criteriaconsensus guidelinesplacentaplacental pathologyreporting standardization

Identifiers

PMID42136565
PMCPMC13558814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.