ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2026
Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comprehensive Review of Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Innovative Therapeutic Advancements.
Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myrica esculenta fruit extract as a nutraceutical supplement mitigating LPS-induced inflammation through COX-2 and iNOS modulation: integrated in vitro, in vivo, and docking approaches.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- FGFR1 signaling in rheumatoid arthritis: Mechanisms of bone destruction and therapeutic targeting (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Hydrogels as Local Structural-Protective Platforms in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Evidence-Graded Review Across the Synovium-Cartilage-Bone Axis.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Role of Phenolic Nanocompounds in Inflammatory Disorders: Current View and Future Aspects.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by persistent synovial inflammation, cartilage degradation, and bone erosion, ultimately leading to joint deformities and functional impairment. Affecting approximately 1% of the global population, RA imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems and patient quality of life. The disease pathogenesis involves a complex interplay between genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, and dysregulated immune responses. While genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple susceptibility loci, genetic factors alone do not fully account for disease onset. Environmental influences, such as smoking, obesity, and microbial dysbiosis, contribute to immune tolerance breakdown, leading to aberrant activation of T cells, B cells, and proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and IL-6. Conventional therapies, including disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologics, have significantly improved disease outcomes but remain limited by non-responsiveness in a subset of patients and long-term safety concerns. Recent advances in nanotechnology, biomimetic drug carriers, and precision medicine offer promising avenues for overcoming these challenges. Innovative therapeutic approaches, such as in situ hydrogels targeting neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), liposomal drug delivery systems enhancing bioavailability, and nanoparticle-based immune modulation, provide new hope for improving treatment efficacy and reducing systemic side effects. This review comprehensively explores RA's multifactorial etiology, immunopathogenesis, and emerging therapeutic strategies, highlighting novel drug delivery systems and personalized treatment approaches that may revolutionize RA management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42136488What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.