Observational studyEndocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea)2026
Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Osteoporosis on Romosozumab Treatment Compared with Denosumab: A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study.
Observational study in Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Romosozumab and Cardiovascular Safety: Bridging the Gap between Clinical Trials and Real-World Evidence.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgruoundRomosozumab, a potent anabolic agent for osteoporosis, has been associated with an increased risk of adjudicated cardiovascular events compared with alendronate in postmenopausal women, although such an association was not observed in a placebo-controlled trial. Evidence from real-world clinical practice remains limited.
methodsIn this multicenter observational study, we analyzed patients aged ≥50 years who were newly prescribed romosozumab 120 mg monthly or denosumab 60 mg every 6 months for osteoporosis at three tertiary hospitals in South Korea between January 1, 2020, and the end of each site's data collection period. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or sudden cardiac death) and all cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs; MACE, heart failure, peripheral artery disease, and non-coronary revascularization), assessed at 1- and 3-year follow-up. Large-scale 1:1 propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models were applied within a common data model framework with individual-level meta-analysis.
resultsA total of 4,896 patients were included in the MACE analysis (4,758 in the CVAE analysis). At 1 year, the incidence rate of MACE did not differ significantly between the romosozumab and denosumab groups (9.20 per 1,000 person-years vs. 6.43 per 1,000 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 3.19). The risk of CVAE was also similar between groups (16.23 per 1,000 person-years vs. 15.45 per 1,000 person-years; aHR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.78). At 3 years, no significant differences were observed for MACE (aHR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.79 to 2.88) or CVAE (aHR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.58).
conclusionIn real-world clinical practice, romosozumab use was not associated with a statistically significant increase in cardiovascular risk compared with denosumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.