Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42136369›Full record

ReviewTraffic (Copenhagen, Denmark)2026

Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis in Plants: Historical to Modern Advances.

Timber Mattson, Sebastian Bednarek, Alex Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timber MattsonDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Sebastian BednarekDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Alex JohnsonBiosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2739-8843

Funding

National Science Foundation MCB-2154572National Science Foundation MCB-2439581University of Exeter
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) is vital to plant physiology; however, the molecular details of how it functions in these complex multicellular eukaryotes remain to be defined relative to model yeast and animal systems. In this review, we explore potential reasons for this including a discussion of the debate of the existence of CME in plants, and the development of tools which have recently advanced our understanding of plant CME, including visualisation of live CME events in intact plants, and ultrastructural and proteomic analysis of plant clathrin-coated vesicles. In addition, we present an updated schematic of the temporal and spatially distinct stages of plant CME that attempts to consolidate our current understanding and to serve as a working model for further study of plant CME. Plants occupy a distinct branch of the evolutionary tree of life relative to yeast and animal systems with their own cellular constraints (e.g., extremely high intracellular turgor pressure conditions). Thus, while the core CME machinery that was predicted to have already been present in the Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor is conserved in plants, it has needed to evolve to overcome these plant cellular constraints. Thus, in this review, we wish to highlight plants as important model organisms for understanding the overall principles governing CME and how it can adapt in mechanically and biochemically distinct ways.

Indexed as

ClathrinClathrin-Coated VesiclesEndocytosisPlantsClathrinactin‐independentadaptor proteinsArabidopsisclathrindynamin‐related proteinselectron microscopyplant clathrin‐mediated endocytosisquantitative live cell imagingTPLATEvesicle proteomics

Identifiers

PMID42136369
PMCPMC13176895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.