ReviewAnatomy & cell biology2026
Accommodating color vision deficiencies in biomedical publications.
Review in Anatomy & cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Color vision deficiencies, especially red-green types such as deuteranomaly and protanopia, affect many individuals, particularly men, and pose challenges in fields that rely on color-coded visualizations. In biomedical journals, figures such as heatmaps and fluorescence images often use red-green color contrasts that are inaccessible to readers with color vision deficiencies, leading to misinterpretation and reduced clarity. Studies show that a large proportion of scientific figures remain problematic, underscoring the need for inclusive design. This review outlines strategies to improve figure accessibility, including avoiding red-green combinations, adopting perceptually uniform palettes, ensuring luminance contrast, and supplementing colors with patterns or annotations. Providing alternative text and testing figures with color-blindness simulators further enhances usability. Incorporating these practices promotes equitable access to scientific knowledge and strengthens the clarity and impact of published research in biomedical journals and textbooks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.