Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42136140›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2026

Step by Step, Day by Day: The First 3 Months of Infant Walking at Home.

Joshua L Schneider, Samantha N Plate, Jenna M Trout, Whitney G Cole, Karen E Adolph, Jana M Iverson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Dips in Development: Learning to Walk Temporarily Disrupts Infant Vocalization.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joshua L SchneiderDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0635-0987
Samantha N PlateDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8812-5534
Jenna M TroutDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Whitney G ColeDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0637-4738
Karen E AdolphDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2819-134X
Jana M IversonDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9160-7825

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
Walking, exploration, and language in high and low risk infantsR01DC016557 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FIEZ, JULIE A · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
National Science Foundation SMA-2313856NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016557NIH HHS R01 DC016557NIH HHS UL1 TR001857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants make learning look easy. They acquire a range of complex foundational skills-walking, talking, reaching, and manipulating objects-rapidly and efficiently. Nonetheless, learning new skills requires both time and practice. Although time and practice are related, the passage of time is not equivalent to the accumulation of practice. Here, we tested the relative contributions of elapsed time and accumulated practice to skill development by focusing on infant walking, a critical behavior for everyday activity. We followed 28 infants (18 boys, 10 girls, M walk onset age = 12.21 months, SD = 1.82) across the first 3 months of walking at home-the period when improvements in walking skill are most rapid and dramatic and the place where development really occurs. We calculated walking age (i.e., elapsed time since walk onset) from prospective tracking of walk onset, quantified walking practice (e.g., accumulated steps per hour) from observations of everyday activity, and measured walking skill (e.g., step length) with a pressure-sensitive gait mat. Longitudinal improvements in walking skill were consistent for all infants, and linear growth for the group reflected individual trajectories. In contrast, developmental change in walking practice was inconsistent for most infants: Spontaneous walking increased and decreased across monthly comparisons. Although walking age was the strongest predictor of improvements in walking skill, everyday practice explained unique variance beyond the effects of elapsed time. Likely, accumulating quantities of everyday walking (the natural input for learning) facilitates skill improvements by providing infants with critical experiences with perceptually guided locomotion in varied environments.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentMotor SkillsFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleTime FactorsWalkinghome observationsinfant walkinglongitudinal changenatural behaviorpracticewalking skill

Identifiers

PMID42136140
PMCPMC13552474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.