ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2026
Step by Step, Day by Day: The First 3 Months of Infant Walking at Home.
Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dips in Development: Learning to Walk Temporarily Disrupts Infant Vocalization.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant StudiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infants make learning look easy. They acquire a range of complex foundational skills-walking, talking, reaching, and manipulating objects-rapidly and efficiently. Nonetheless, learning new skills requires both time and practice. Although time and practice are related, the passage of time is not equivalent to the accumulation of practice. Here, we tested the relative contributions of elapsed time and accumulated practice to skill development by focusing on infant walking, a critical behavior for everyday activity. We followed 28 infants (18 boys, 10 girls, M walk onset age = 12.21 months, SD = 1.82) across the first 3 months of walking at home-the period when improvements in walking skill are most rapid and dramatic and the place where development really occurs. We calculated walking age (i.e., elapsed time since walk onset) from prospective tracking of walk onset, quantified walking practice (e.g., accumulated steps per hour) from observations of everyday activity, and measured walking skill (e.g., step length) with a pressure-sensitive gait mat. Longitudinal improvements in walking skill were consistent for all infants, and linear growth for the group reflected individual trajectories. In contrast, developmental change in walking practice was inconsistent for most infants: Spontaneous walking increased and decreased across monthly comparisons. Although walking age was the strongest predictor of improvements in walking skill, everyday practice explained unique variance beyond the effects of elapsed time. Likely, accumulating quantities of everyday walking (the natural input for learning) facilitates skill improvements by providing infants with critical experiences with perceptually guided locomotion in varied environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.