Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42136075›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2026

The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Chronic Conditions Physician-Patient Relationship Scale in family medicine practice.

Duygu Ayhan Başer, Ogulcan Çöme, Emre Sari, Nezaket Sabir

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Duygu Ayhan BaşerDepartment of Family Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicinehttps://ror.org/04kwvgz42, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5153-2184
Ogulcan ÇömeDepartment of Family Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-6624-832X
Emre SariDepartment of Family Medicine, Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Medicine, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2843-433X
Nezaket SabirDepartment of Family Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0009-9257-9331

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to adapt the Chronic Conditions Physician-Patient Relationship Scale (CC-PPR) into Turkish and to examine its validity and reliability among patients with chronic diseases receiving care from family physicians.

methodsA methodological study was conducted with 254 adult patients attending the Family Medicine Centers between May 01-October 01, 2025. The adaptation process followed World Health Organization guidelines. Construct validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability was assessed through internal consistency (Cronbach's α, McDonald's

resultsThe CFA supported the original one-factor, 22-item structure with an excellent model fit (

conclusionThe Turkish version of the CC-PPR is a psychometrically robust, unidimensional, and reliable tool for evaluating the quality of family physician-patient relationships among individuals with chronic conditions. It can be used to assess communication and relational competencies of family physicians, support patient-centred care initiatives in chronic disease management.

Indexed as

Family PracticePhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeychronic diseasesfamily medicinephysician–patient relationshipprimary carereliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID42136075
PMCPMC13186970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.