Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42136062›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2026

Impact of Hormonal and Radiation Therapy on Bladder Outlet Obstruction in High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Pressure-Flow Study.

Yuki Kyoda, Masakazu Hori, Mitsuhiro Nakanishi, Tetsuya Shindo, Kohei Hashimoto, Ko Kobayashi, Toshiaki Tanaka, Naoya Masumori

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuki KyodaDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2046-5051
Masakazu HoriDepartment of Radiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Mitsuhiro NakanishiDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Tetsuya ShindoDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4990-8330
Kohei HashimotoDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0873-4642
Ko KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Toshiaki TanakaDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1199-9302
Naoya MasumoriDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6324-0739

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are few reports investigating urodynamic changes after radiotherapy and hormonal therapy (HT) for prostate cancer. We prospectively evaluated differences in bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) using pressure-flow studies (PFS) before and after HT and radiotherapy in patients with high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer.

methodsThis single-center prospective observational study enrolled 20 consecutive men scheduled for HT followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy. PFS, uroflowmetry, symptom questionnaire surveys, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed at baseline, 6 months, and 24 months after initiation of HT. Radiotherapy was initiated after the 6-month evaluation. The primary endpoint was the change in the bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI), defined as the difference between baseline and 24 months after initiation of HT.

resultsAll patients completed the 24-month protocol. Mean BOOI decreased from 44.3 ± 23.4 at baseline to 26.8 ± 25.0 at 6 months (p < 0.01) and remained significantly reduced at 33.2 ± 29.1 at 24 months (p < 0.05). Prostate volume was reduced significantly by 43% at 6 months (p < 0.01) and by 41% at 24 months (p < 0.01). MRI demonstrated resolution of malignant lesions by 6 months in all patients, with no recurrence at 24 months. Three patients (15%) exhibited a BOOI reduction > 30, and all three had periurethral tumors prior to treatment.

conclusionThis first prospective PFS-based study demonstrates that combined HT and radiotherapy improve BOO, particularly during HT, likely through reduction of prostate and tumor volume. Patients with periurethral tumors may achieve greater improvement in BOO. These findings underscore the importance of considering treatment-induced BOO changes in therapeutic decision-making.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: UMIN-CTR; UMIN000040312.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedUrinary Bladder Neck ObstructionAgedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrodynamicsAntineoplastic Agents, Hormonalbladder outlet obstructionpressure flow studyprostate cancerradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42136062
PMCPMC13176665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.