ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2026
Current Practices in Postmortem Investigation of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy.
Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy: Two European Models, One Diagnostic Imperative.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Article
- Response to 'Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy: Two European Models, One Diagnostic Imperative'.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess postmortem investigations performed in sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) cases in daily practice in France.
methodsChildren deceased from SUDI and registered in the French SUDI registry from 2015 to 2024 were included retrospectively. The postmortem investigations performed in SUDI cases were described, their temporal trends since 2015 and their compliance with the French National Health Authority guidelines were assessed. The minimum set of non-invasive postmortem investigations performed in cases required to detect unnatural death, including fundus examinations, imaging and toxicological tests, was studied.
resultsWe examined 1 934 SUDI cases. Laboratory tests were the most frequently performed procedures (93.0%), and fundus examinations were the least frequent (21.6%). There was a significant increase in fundus examinations (9.3% to 31.6%), laboratory tests (87.6% to 97.3%), bacteriological tests (91.4% to 97.2%), toxicological tests (79.0% to 91.0%), and whole-body imaging (75.2% to 87.3%) from 2015 to 2024. Only 2.1% of cases were investigated strictly according to the French guidelines. We found that 13.2% of cases underwent minimal non-invasive postmortem investigation for detecting unnatural death.
conclusionAlthough certain investigations are performed more frequently, efforts to improve local protocols and updated guidelines are needed to ensure thorough postmortem investigations, resulting in an improved diagnostic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.