Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135870›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2026

Movement simulations reveal both memory and social information drive individual foraging site fidelity in gannets.

Christopher J Pollock, Jude V Lane, Ruth Jeavons, Victoria Warwick-Evans, Robert W Furness, Tim G Benton, Keith C Hamer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher J PollockSchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. chrpol@ceh.ac.uk.
Jude V LaneSchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Ruth JeavonsSchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Victoria Warwick-EvansEcosystems Team, British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, CB3 OET, UK.
Robert W FurnessSLR Consulting, 93 South Woodside Road, Glasgow, G20 6NT, UK.
Tim G BentonSchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Keith C HamerSchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.

Funding

Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK Government Offshore Energy Strategic Environmental Assessment research programmeNatural Environment Research Council NE/L002574/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/P009387/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlongside their direct perceptions of prey, Northern gannets (Morus bassanus) likely derive foraging cues from memory of previously successful foraging areas (private information), and from conspecifics (public information). Together these mechanisms are likely to underpin emergent Individual foraging site fidelity (IFSF) patterns, characterised by individual consistency in foraging area use. Where observation methods are inadequate in helping us determine IFSF properties, simulation experiments can help decipher the implicit foraging strategies present in an organism's movements.

methodsWe began by developing a movement simulation model to simulate spatially explicit foraging trips of chick-rearing gannets at Bass Rock, capturing direct perception of prey only. Once confidence in the foundational model was achieved, we made modifications to the model to incorporate various implementations of public and private information use in foraging strategies. The model outputs from simulations experiments, encompassing a wide range of complexity, were compared to several empirically derived patterns at the individual and population level, to gain insight into which mechanisms may be driving IFSF patterns and the potential consequences on a population's space use.

resultsPatterns observed in standalone foraging trips were well represented by our movement simulations, permitting further developments to include public and private information use. Mechanisms using private information, namely memory based reuse of previously successful departure directions, were the primary drivers of IFSF. Incorporating social information refined these patterns, improving alignment with prey distributions and enhancing realism at the population-level, irrespective of the private information employed. However, mechanisms that best reproduced emergent individual and population level spatial patterns were associated with reduced foraging efficiency, inferred from longer trip durations and greater travel distances, indicating a trade-off between spatial segregation and short-term efficiency.

conclusionOur results support the idea that IFSF can emerge from hierarchical foraging strategies in which long-term private information structures broad-scale space use, while social information modulates fine-scale movements. By linking behavioural mechanisms to emergent movement patterns in a spatially explicit environment, our study illustrates how individual-based models can move beyond description to generate mechanistic and predictive insights into animal movement, improving our ability to anticipate responses to environmental change.

Indexed as

Individual-based modelIndividual foraging site fidelityMovement simulationsNorthern gannetSeabirds

Identifiers

PMID42135870
PMCPMC13343878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.