ArticleMovement ecology2026
Movement simulations reveal both memory and social information drive individual foraging site fidelity in gannets.
Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlongside their direct perceptions of prey, Northern gannets (Morus bassanus) likely derive foraging cues from memory of previously successful foraging areas (private information), and from conspecifics (public information). Together these mechanisms are likely to underpin emergent Individual foraging site fidelity (IFSF) patterns, characterised by individual consistency in foraging area use. Where observation methods are inadequate in helping us determine IFSF properties, simulation experiments can help decipher the implicit foraging strategies present in an organism's movements.
methodsWe began by developing a movement simulation model to simulate spatially explicit foraging trips of chick-rearing gannets at Bass Rock, capturing direct perception of prey only. Once confidence in the foundational model was achieved, we made modifications to the model to incorporate various implementations of public and private information use in foraging strategies. The model outputs from simulations experiments, encompassing a wide range of complexity, were compared to several empirically derived patterns at the individual and population level, to gain insight into which mechanisms may be driving IFSF patterns and the potential consequences on a population's space use.
resultsPatterns observed in standalone foraging trips were well represented by our movement simulations, permitting further developments to include public and private information use. Mechanisms using private information, namely memory based reuse of previously successful departure directions, were the primary drivers of IFSF. Incorporating social information refined these patterns, improving alignment with prey distributions and enhancing realism at the population-level, irrespective of the private information employed. However, mechanisms that best reproduced emergent individual and population level spatial patterns were associated with reduced foraging efficiency, inferred from longer trip durations and greater travel distances, indicating a trade-off between spatial segregation and short-term efficiency.
conclusionOur results support the idea that IFSF can emerge from hierarchical foraging strategies in which long-term private information structures broad-scale space use, while social information modulates fine-scale movements. By linking behavioural mechanisms to emergent movement patterns in a spatially explicit environment, our study illustrates how individual-based models can move beyond description to generate mechanistic and predictive insights into animal movement, improving our ability to anticipate responses to environmental change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.