ReviewJournal of intensive care2026
The balance between classical and alternative renin-angiotensin system in ARDS: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a complex inflammatory condition often requiring admission to intensive care. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has emerged as a key modulator of lung inflammation, vascular tone, permeability and pulmonary fibrosis in ARDS. Its effect depend on the activated biochemical pathway during the course of the disease: the classical Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE)/Angiotensin II/AT1R pathway exerts pro-inflammatory, vasoconstrictive and profibrotic effects, whereas the alternative ACE2/Angiotensin 1-7/MasR axis is associated with anti-inflammatory, vasodilatory and antifibrotic properties. Therapeutic research has largely focused on enhancing the alternative RAS to attenuate inflammation and fibrosis; however, emerging evidence suggests that activation of the classical RAS through exogenous angiotensin II administration may provide clinical benefit in selected etiologies of ARDS, potentially by improving systemic hemodynamic stability and modulating pulmonary vascular resistances. This interplay between the two RAS axes underscores the complexity of their role in ARDS pathophysiology and raises the possibility that selective, stage-dependent modulation of both pathways may represent a new therapeutic approach in this context. This narrative review examines the dual influence of RAS pathways in ARDS and explores the potential for targeted therapeutic interventions at different disease stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.