ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2026
Prognostic value of estimated pulse wave velocity for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in individuals with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome: analyses of NHANES 2007-2018.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) on the prognosis of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome has not been explored. This study investigated the association between ePWV and mortality and its predictive performance in individuals with CKM syndrome.
methodsThis population-based prospective study of 9,416 American participants used ordinal logistic regression to assess the association between ePWV and CKM syndrome severity. Cox regression was applied to evaluate the relationship between ePWV and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at different CKM stages, as well as their interaction effects on mortality. To evaluate the predictive performance, the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated, and the predictive capabilities of the combined model incorporating both CKM syndrome and ePWV were compared with CKM syndrome alone. Furthermore, various machine learning models were developed for prediction.
resultsePWV was found to be significantly associated with the severity of CKM syndrome, with a common odds ratio (cOR) of 1.73 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.68-1.77] per 1 m/s increase in ePWV. Moreover, ePWV demonstrated a significant association with both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Specifically, the hazard ratios (HR) per 1 m/s increase in ePWV were: 1.60 [95% CI: 1.51-1.69] for all-cause mortality in participants with early-stage CKM, 1.29 [95% CI: 1.23-1.35] for all-cause mortality in participants with advanced-stage CKM, 1.84 [95% CI: 1.63-2.08] for cardiovascular mortality in participants with early-stage CKM, and 1.23 [95% CI: 1.13-1.34] for cardiovascular mortality in participants with advanced-stage CKM. A notable interaction effect between ePWV and CKM syndrome was observed for both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (P for interaction < 0.001). ePWV significantly enhanced the predictive performance of CKM syndrome for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality [the net reclassification improvement (NRI) across different time points ranged from 0.25 to 0.382 for all-cause mortality and from 0.005 to 0.431 for cardiovascular mortality]. Furthermore, the combination of ePWV and CKM syndrome demonstrated strong predictive power in most models (time-dependent AUC > 0.7).
conclusionePWV serves as a critical indicator for both the severity and the mortality risk among individuals with CKM syndrome. ePWV significantly enhanced the accuracy of mortality risk prediction of CKM syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.