ArticleBMC psychology2026
National identity and social connectedness among Chinese college students with disabilities: examining the multiple mediating roles of social media use motives and use diversity.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This cross‑sectional study examined the associations of national identity with social connectedness among Chinese college students with disabilities, testing social media use motives and use diversity as multiple mediators. Data were drawn from 527 valid survey responses, with participants completing validated scales assessing national identity, social connectedness, social media use motives, and social media use diversity. All analyses controlled for key demographic covariates, and indirect effects were estimated using bias‑corrected bootstrap methods. Bivariate associations were examined with Pearson correlations, and multiple mediation effects were tested using bias‑corrected bootstrap methods with 5,000 resamples. National identity was significantly and positively associated with social media use motives, and significantly and negatively associated with use diversity. Social media use motives were significantly and positively associated with social connectedness, while the association between use diversity and social connectedness was non-significant. National identity had no significant direct association with social connectedness, but its total indirect effect was significant-only the mediating path of use motives was statistically valid (the other two paths were non-significant). In essence, national identity is linked to these students' social connectedness primarily through its positive association with social media use motives. This study enriches theoretical research on the drivers of social connectedness for this group and provides empirical evidence for improving their social integration via national identity education and targeted social media guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.